Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)

The Patient-Specific Functional Scale asks the patient to name the activities their problem makes hard, up to five, and rate each from 0, unable to do it, to 10, as able as before the problem. The score is the average of the ratings, and the same activities are rated again at each review. See how to choose good activities, work out the average, tell real change from noise, and record every rating with the free template.

  • Score bands explained
  • Recording template to copy
  • Two recorded examples

PSFS result template

Free
PSFS RECORD

Date: [Date]
Patient: [Name or ID, age]
Assessment point: [First visit, review number, or discharge]
Asked by: [Clinician who asked for or read back the activities; language and interpreter if used]

PROBLEM BEING RATED
Condition: [Diagnosis or main complaint, side if it applies, and date of onset or surgery]
Roles it affects: [Work, caring, sport, or hobbies the problem gets in the way of]

ACTIVITY RATINGS, 0 TO 10
Activity 1: [Activity in the patient's words; rating today; rating at the first visit]
Activity 2: [Activity in the patient's words; rating today; rating at the first visit]
Activity 3: [Activity in the patient's words; rating today; rating at the first visit]
Activity 4: [Activity and ratings, or not named]
Activity 5: [Activity and ratings, or not named]
Added since the first visit: [New activity with its first rating and date, or none]

AVERAGE
PSFS average today: [Sum of today's ratings divided by the number of activities, to one decimal]
Description: [Severe, moderate, or mild or no limitation]
First-visit average: [Date and average]

CHANGE SINCE THE FIRST VISIT
Each activity: [Points gained or lost; 3 or more on one activity is beyond measurement error]
Average: [Points gained or lost; 2 or more is beyond measurement error]
Exam beside the ratings: [Range, strength, or tests that agree or disagree with them]

TARGETS
Target per activity: [Rating aimed for on each activity, and by when]
Progress: [Met, getting there, or not met, for each target]

PLAN
Treatment focus: [What the next sessions work on, starting with the lowest-rated activity]
Next rating: [Date or visit for the next PSFS, with the same activities]

Clinician: [Name, credentials]

Get the official PSFS from its source.

Who holds it

P. Stratford (© 1995, all rights reserved). Developed by P. Stratford, C. Gill, M. Westaway and J. Binkley.

How you may use it

The PSFS is copyrighted, and the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab’s RehabMeasures database lists it as free to use. Mapi Research Trust’s ePROVIDE lists the official form and 27 translations; access and the conditions of use open after a free sign-up. Check those conditions before reproducing it in research, a publication, or software.

Use it for

  • Outpatient physical therapy
  • Chiropractic care
  • Occupational therapy
  • Work injury rehab
  • Home health visits
  • Telehealth visits

What the score means. 0 to 10, average activity rating, 10 means as able as before.

0 to 3.9: Severe limitation

The activities that matter most are very hard or not possible. Common at the first visit after an injury, a flare, or surgery: start with the activity closest to possible, and rate again within 2 to 4 weeks.

4 to 6.9: Moderate limitation

The activities are possible with real difficulty, or only part of the way. Aim treatment at the lowest-rated activity, and set a target rating for each one.

7 to 10: Mild or no limitation

Close to how the patient managed before the problem, and 10 is fully back to that level. Plan discharge to a home program once the targets are met and the patient is doing the activities.
  • Add the activity ratings, each 0 to 10, and divide by the number of activities. The average runs from 0 to 10, and higher means better function.
  • The patient names up to five activities; three is common. Rate the same activities, in the same words, at every review.
  • The developers published no severity bands. The three bands here are not official: they split the scale to help describe a score. Track the change in each activity rather than the band.
  • In the developers’ first study, the minimal detectable change at 90% confidence was 2 points for the average and 3 points for a single activity. A smaller change may be measurement error.
  • Studies of the smallest change that matters to patients found about 1.2 to 2.2 points on the average, depending on the condition. Many clinics count 2 points on the average as real, meaningful change.
  • Some groups need larger changes on a single activity before it’s beyond measurement error: about 3 to 5 points after knee replacement and in people with a lower limb amputation.
  • Each patient chooses their own activities, so an average of 5.0 doesn’t mean the same function in two patients. Compare a patient only with themselves, and use change scores, not levels, when reporting on a group.
  • It works for any condition and any body region. It has been studied in neck pain, low back pain, knee and upper limb problems, and older adults living at home, among others, so it fits where no region-specific measure does.
  • Retest reliability was high in the first study, with an ICC of 0.97, and mostly above 0.8 in later studies, though lower in a few groups.

How to give it, score it, and read it.

Choosing the activities

At the first visit, after the history and before the exam, the clinician asks which everyday activities the problem makes hard or impossible. The patient names up to five; three is common.

  • Write each activity in the patient’s words, and make it specific: “carrying the laundry down the basement stairs”, not “housework”
  • Choose activities the patient does, or needs to do, often enough to rate again in a few weeks
  • Use the official form in the patient’s language, with its own instructions
  • Note the problem being rated, so later ratings are about the same problem

Avoid: Choosing the activities for the patient. Prompt if they’re stuck, but the activities should be the ones that matter to them.

Rating each one

The patient rates each activity from 0, unable to do it, to 10, able to do it at the level before the problem. It takes a few minutes.

  • Show the patient the 0 to 10 scale while they rate
  • Ask how they manage each activity at present
  • Take one whole number per activity

Avoid: Rating what you saw in the session. The PSFS records the patient’s own view of what they can do.

Working out the average

Add the ratings and divide by the number of activities, for an average from 0 to 10.

  • Record every activity and rating, not only the average
  • Give the average to one decimal place: three activities rated 2, 3, and 5 average 3.3
  • Read a single activity against 3 points of change and the average against 2 points

Avoid: Reporting the sum. A sum of 15 from three activities and a sum of 15 from five mean very different things.

Rating again at review

At each review, read back the activities from the first visit, and the patient rates each one again.

  • Use the first-visit wording for every activity
  • Decide whether patients see their earlier ratings, and do it the same way every time
  • Add a new activity with its own first rating, and work out change from baseline on the original activities
  • Rate again every 2 to 4 weeks, or at each progress report, and at discharge

Targets and discharge

Each activity is a ready-made goal: a target rating, tied to a date.

  • Set targets at least 3 points above the first rating, so reaching one is a real change
  • Tie discharge to the targets and to the patient actually doing the activities
  • Pair the PSFS with a region-specific measure, such as the LEFS or the Neck Disability Index, when you also need a score that compares with other patients

Avoid: Discharging on a high average when one activity that matters, such as a work task, is still low.

Two recorded results. Every part, filled in.

Each one follows the recording template. Use them to judge how much to write.

PSFS result: roofer with shoulder pain, re-assessment at week 6

Outpatient physical therapy, re-assessment at visit 9

Problem being rated

52-year-old roofer who runs a crew of three. Right shoulder pain for 10 weeks, worst reaching overhead and carrying; it began during a week of re-roofing. Ultrasound showed supraspinatus tendinopathy with no full-thickness tear. On light duties since: ground work and supervising only.

Activity ratings

Carrying a bundle of shingles, about 30 kg (65 lb), up a ladder: 2 at the first visit, 6 today. Nailing at shoulder height and above for an hour: 3, now 7. Sleeping on his right side through the night: 5, now 8.

Average

PSFS 7.0 today, 21 divided by 3: mild or no limitation. First visit, 6 weeks ago: 3.3, severe limitation.

Change since the first visit

Average up 3.7, well beyond the 2-point detectable change. Each activity up 3 or 4 points, so all three are beyond the 3-point change for a single activity. Active elevation 165°, up from 120°; painful arc gone; external rotation strength 4+/5 on the right.

Targets

Ladder carry 8 and overhead nailing 8 by week 12, for full days on the roof. Side-sleeping 8: met.

Plan

Graded return to roof work over 4 weeks: half days for 2 weeks, carrying half bundles at first. Loaded rotator cuff and overhead strengthening, once a week here with the home program. Rate the same three activities at week 12; discharge to the home program when both work targets are met.

Common mistakes, and how to avoid them.

Comparing one patient with another

An average of 5 means one thing for a roofer on a ladder and another for someone walking to the mailbox. Compare each patient only with their own earlier ratings.

Letting the activities drift

If the patient rated “stairs” at the first visit and rates “stairs at work” later, the two numbers don’t compare. Read back the first-visit wording each time.

Accepting vague activities

“Housework” and “sport” are hard to rate the same way twice. Ask which part is hard: vacuuming the stairs, or serving at tennis.

Calling a 1-point gain progress

One point on one activity is within measurement error. Look for 3 points on an activity or 2 on the average, and for a trend across reviews.

Recording only the average

The average hides the activity that’s stuck. Record each activity and its rating, so the plan targets the lowest one.

Ask the ratings. Review the note.

Vero Scribe records the PSFS in your template from the session, with the patient’s consent, or from your dictation: each activity in the patient’s words, today’s rating beside the first one, the average, and the plan. You review and edit every line, then copy it into your record. Vero works in 60+ languages.

Try Vero free

Frequently asked questions.

How do you score the PSFS?

The patient rates each activity they named from 0, unable to do it, to 10, able to do it at the level before the problem. Add the ratings and divide by the number of activities: ratings of 2, 3, and 5 give an average of 3.3. Record each rating as well as the average.

What does a PSFS score mean?

The higher the average, the closer the patient is to how they managed before the problem; 10 means fully back to that level. There are no official bands. This page describes 0 to 3.9 as severe limitation, 4 to 6.9 as moderate, and 7 to 10 as mild or none, as a guide only. Because the activities are the patient’s own, read the score against their earlier ratings, not against other patients.

What change in the PSFS is meaningful?

In the developers’ first study, a change of 2 points in the average, or 3 points on a single activity, was beyond measurement error at 90% confidence. Studies of the smallest change that matters to patients found about 1.2 to 2.2 points on the average, depending on the condition. Many clinics count 2 points on the average, or 3 on one activity, as real change.

How many activities should the patient name?

Up to five, and three is common. With fewer activities, each rating counts for more in the average, so record how many were named and rate the same ones at every review.

Can the activities change at follow-up?

Keep the first-visit activities and read them back each time, in the same words. If a new activity comes up, such as a return to a sport, add it with its own first rating and track it from there. Work out change from baseline on the original activities, so the number stays comparable.

How is the PSFS different from the LEFS, Oswestry, or Neck Disability Index?

Those measures ask every patient the same questions about one body region, so scores compare across patients. The PSFS asks about the activities this patient chose, for any region or condition: it picks up what matters to them, but compares only with itself. Many clinics use both, a region-specific measure and the PSFS.

Who can give the PSFS?

Any clinician. The clinician asks for the activities at the end of the history, before the exam, and the patient rates them; it takes a few minutes and needs no training. Physical therapists use it most, along with chiropractors, occupational therapists, and physicians.

Is the PSFS free?

The Shirley Ryan AbilityLab’s RehabMeasures database lists the PSFS as free to use, and the copyright is held by P. Stratford. Mapi Research Trust’s ePROVIDE site lists the official form and 27 translations, with the conditions of use, after a free sign-up. Check them before using it in research, a publication, or software. The recording template on this page is free to copy or download.

More function and pain tools, and templates.

PROMIS

Patient-reported measures of symptoms and function, scored as T-scores with 50 as the average: short forms, CATs, and the PROMIS-29.

Open the PROMIS

Katz ADL

Six basic self-care activities rated independent or dependent, scored 0 to 6, for function and care needs in older adults.

Open the Katz ADL

Lawton IADL

Eight independent living tasks, from shopping to finances, each scored 0 or 1: a total from 0, dependent, to 8, independent.

Open the Lawton IADL

QuickDASH

Eleven questions on arm, shoulder, and hand function over the past week, scored 0 to 100: the higher, the more disability.

Open the QuickDASH

LEFS

Twenty everyday activities rated for difficulty: lower limb function scored 0 to 80, higher is better, and 9 points is a real change.

Open the LEFS

Physical therapy evaluation template

Where the first PSFS ratings go, with the exam, goals, and plan of care.

Learn more about Physical therapy evaluation template

Physical therapy progress report template

Ratings beside baseline, goal status, and the case to continue.

Learn more about Physical therapy progress report template

Occupational therapy evaluation template

Daily activities, roles, and goals from the first session.

Learn more about Occupational therapy evaluation template

Vero for physical therapy

Evaluations, daily notes, and progress reports from the session.

Learn more about Vero for physical therapy

Score it. Vero writes it up.

Vero records scores, findings, and plans in the templates you choose, so you review instead of type.

Try Vero free

No credit card required. 10 free actions every month.