Finish the clinical note
Capture the visit by audio, dictation, typed context, or uploaded files. Vero turns it into your chosen note structure.
Review candidate ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for U.S. workflows or ICD-10-CA suggestions for Canadian workflows beside the finished note and its supporting context. Approve, edit, or ignore every suggestion before use.

Capture the visit by audio, dictation, typed context, or uploaded files. Vero turns it into your chosen note structure.
Vero reads the completed assessment and plan, then surfaces candidate ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes or ICD-10-CA codes beside the note.
Accept, edit, or ignore each suggestion. The reviewed note and selected codes stay together for your existing EHR workflow.

Vero connects a suggestion to the note context that produced it. Review the assessment, supporting detail, and code in one surface—then decide what belongs in the final documentation.
Suggestions use the conditions, symptoms, findings, assessment, and plan documented across the note.
When the documentation changes, the suggestion set can update so it reflects the final draft.
Configure the coding field that matches your jurisdiction and clinical documentation workflow.
Keep the note, supporting context, and suggested codes together instead of jumping between tools.
Laterality, acuity, encounter type, and other documented details help support more specific suggestions.
Vero proposes; your team decides. Nothing on this page replaces current guidelines or coding judgment.
An ICD-10 code is a standardized way to represent a diagnosis or reason for a visit. Vero’s AI medical coding workflow is designed for a narrower job: read the clinical note you have already finished, surface a possible code beside the supporting context, and give you a clear place to review it.
A useful ICD-10 code suggestion should point back to the condition, findings, assessment, and plan already documented for the encounter.
Laterality, acuity, encounter type, complications, and causal relationships should come from the record.
A clinician or qualified coding professional still applies the active code set, official guidance, payer rules, and organizational policy.
Need a reference rather than a suggestion? Browse Vero’s ICD-10 code reference hub or search ICD-10-CM code descriptions.
Searching for the ICD-10 code for right knee pain may surface a symptom code such as M25.561. When the finished note documents primary osteoarthritis and right laterality, a diagnosis code such as M17.11 may be the relevant candidate. In the diabetes example above, E11.9 describes type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. The record determines what can be supported.
Vero provides AI-assisted clinical documentation and reviewable code suggestions. Apply the classification and official guidance in effect for the encounter, along with your care setting, payer requirements, and organizational policy.
ICD-10-CM is the U.S. diagnosis classification used for the examples on this page. Confirm the release that applies to the date of service.
For Canadian workflows, ICD-10-CA is CIHI’s Canadian modification for classifying diseases and related health conditions. CCI is the separate Canadian classification for health interventions. Confirm the current version and applicable provincial or organizational requirements before use.
They are candidate diagnosis codes surfaced from the clinical context already documented in a finished note. Vero places each suggestion beside the note so a clinician can compare it with the supporting context, then accept, edit, or ignore it before use.
Vero reads the finished note, including documented conditions, symptoms, findings, assessment, and plan, then surfaces candidate codes supported by that context. If you revise the documentation, the suggested code set can refresh with it.
A lookup starts with a term or code you enter. Vero starts with the completed clinical note and proposes codes from its documented context. If you need a reference instead, Vero also provides a separate ICD-10-CM code library for browsing and searching official code descriptions.
No. Vero suggests candidate codes inside the documentation workflow, but it does not automatically submit a claim. A clinician or qualified coding professional remains responsible for reviewing the final note, applicable guidelines, payer requirements, and the code used downstream.
No. A suggestion can be incomplete or incorrect when documentation is ambiguous, required specificity is missing, or a different guideline applies. Review every candidate against the final note, the active code set, care setting, official guidance, payer rules, and organizational policy before use.
Vero uses the clinical note created from the encounter, including the conditions, symptoms, findings, assessment, and plan you documented. Complete details such as laterality, acuity, encounter type, and complications give the system stronger context; Vero should not infer details that are absent from the record.
They can. Vero can refresh the candidate code set as you refine the note, helping the coding panel stay aligned with the final documentation instead of an earlier draft.
Vero supports ICD-10-CM diagnosis-code suggestions for U.S. workflows and ICD-10-CA suggestions for Canadian workflows. Choose the code set that matches your jurisdiction, template, and organization’s coding process.
Yes. You can add an ICD-10-CM or ICD-10-CA field to a Vero template, including a custom template, so candidate codes appear as part of the note workflow you already use.
Vero supports a broad range of specialties and clinical disciplines. The feature reads the context in each note rather than forcing every specialty into one fixed documentation format, but the person reviewing the suggestion must still apply specialty- and setting-specific coding requirements.
Vero can surface a candidate supported by documented symptoms, conditions, and findings. The reviewer must decide whether a symptom code, a confirmed diagnosis, or another coding approach is appropriate under the guidance for that encounter.
Vero uses the specificity available in the note. If required details such as laterality, acuity, encounter type, or a causal relationship are missing, update the documentation and review the refreshed suggestion instead of assuming a more specific code.
Use the release that applies to the date of service and confirm the candidate against current official files and guidelines. Vero maintains supported code sets, while coding teams remain responsible for checking the effective release and any organization- or payer-specific requirements.
Vero’s Trust Center lists SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, and PIPEDA compliance. It states that customer data is not sold and that customer health records are not permitted to train public AI models. Review the Trust Center for current controls, data handling, residency, and subprocessors.
After review, use the copy, export, or integration options enabled for your Vero workflow. Availability varies by organization and EHR setup. Vero does not automatically submit a claim, so your team still controls final entry and downstream billing steps.
No. Vero is a documentation and coding-assistance tool. Complex encounters, sequencing decisions, payer policies, organizational rules, and audit questions may require review by a qualified coding professional.
Vero includes a 7-day full-access trial and 10 free actions every month. Paid plans add unlimited actions and the broader Vero clinical documentation workflow; check the pricing page for current plan details.

Try Vero’s AI medical scribe with ICD-10 suggestions—free for your first encounters.