DAP Notes: Format, Examples, and a Documentation Checklist
DAP notes organize a progress note into Data, Assessment and Plan. Data records what the client reported and what happened during the encounter. Assessment explains the clinician’s interpretation. Plan records the agreed next steps. In behavioral health, this structure helps a reader follow the session’s evidence through to the treatment decision. Austin Peay State University’s DAP handout
For example, “Client reported preparing two evening meals this week” belongs in Data. “This is progress from the recorded baseline, with the weekly goal still unmet” belongs in Assessment. The next activity and review date belong in Plan.
This guide covers adult outpatient mental health progress notes. The cases are fictional, with source facts supplied before each finished note. Professional and payer sources checked November 11, 2026.
What belongs in each DAP section
Start with the encounter details: client identifier, service date, setting, service type, participants, actual service time where required, and the author’s identity and credentials. Record the entry and authentication dates separately when they differ from the encounter date. DAP supplies the narrative headings; these other fields still need a place in the record.
| Section | Include | Original wording example |
|---|---|---|
| D — Data | Relevant client report, observations, intervention delivered and client response. Identify sources and time periods. | “Casey reported preparing an evening meal on 2 of the past 7 days. During planning, Casey chose two meals after the clinician offered three options.” |
| A — Assessment | Clinical interpretation of those findings, progress toward the identified goal, barriers and reasons for the treatment decision. | “Meal preparation increased from the reported baseline of 0 days, but the 3-day weekly objective is not yet met. Selecting an activity still required support.” |
| P — Plan | Agreed actions, who will do them, the next contact or review, and any change to the existing plan. | “Casey will try the two selected meals before November 18. Morgan will review the activity record at the confirmed November 18 appointment.” |
Data: distinguish reports from observations
“Casey reported” identifies information from the client. “The clinician observed” identifies something witnessed. A family member’s account needs its own attribution, including the date and relevant permission or disclosure context. If accounts conflict, preserve the difference until it is clarified. The collateral-information guide shows how to document competing accounts.
Include enough detail about the intervention to explain the response. “Discussed coping” leaves the reader guessing. “Reviewed the activity record, explored what made meal preparation difficult and helped the client choose a smaller task” describes the work. State whether the person tried the activity, declined it, needed prompts or demonstrated a skill independently.
The Data section can contain both subjective and observable information. Attribute each finding to the client, clinician or other source. A brief quotation can capture a client’s preference without interrupting the account of the session.
Assessment: explain what the evidence means
Interpret the findings in relation to the current treatment plan. Identify the objective being reviewed and the comparison period. “Improving” becomes more useful when the reader can see what changed, how it was measured and what remains difficult.
A clinician might consider fatigue, avoidance, access to supplies and the size of an agreed task when interpreting an activity record. The note should show which explanation the encounter supports and what still needs investigation. A missing activity record is missing information; it is not automatically evidence that the client did nothing.
Separate a response during the session from change in daily life. Successfully choosing a meal in the office does not establish that the client prepared it at home. Similarly, a calm presentation cannot substitute for the findings of a safety assessment. Record the inquiry, findings, clinical reasoning and actions actually completed; leave unassessed domains identifiable. The mental status exam guide covers observation language in more detail.
Plan: specify the next decision
Name the agreed action and the person responsible. Include the next appointment if confirmed, or the scheduling work still outstanding. For a referral, record whether it was discussed, sent, acknowledged or accepted, with a follow-up owner for any unfinished step.
“Continue weekly therapy” may describe frequency, but it leaves the next session’s purpose unclear. A more useful plan says what the clinician will review and what might lead to a change. Record a client’s disagreement or preferred alternative when it affects the plan.
DAP notes example: DP-01
In this fictional individual psychotherapy encounter, Casey meets with Morgan, an LCSW.
Source facts for the encounter
- The office session took place November 11, 2026, from 10:00 to 10:45. Morgan entered and signed the note at 11:05.
- The October 28 intake documented a depressive disorder and difficulty starting routine activities. The existing plan specifies weekly 45-minute sessions through its December 2 review. Its objective is to prepare an evening meal on at least 3 days per week for 2 consecutive weeks by December 2. Casey’s reported baseline was 0 of 7 days.
- Casey brought an activity record for November 4–10 showing meals prepared on 2 of 7 days, consistent with Casey’s verbal report. Casey said, “I can start if I decide what to make before I get home.” Fatigue and indecision continued to interfere on other days.
- Morgan reviewed the record, explored the barriers and used activity scheduling to break meal preparation into choosing, obtaining ingredients and preparing food. After Morgan offered three options, Casey chose two meals and wrote a shopping list without further prompts.
- Casey participated throughout and spoke quietly at a conversational rate. In direct inquiry, Casey reported no suicidal thoughts or self-harm since the previous session. No standardized symptom measure was administered during this visit.
- Casey preferred a paper activity record to an app. Casey and Morgan agreed on two meal attempts before the next visit, leaving the longer-term 3-day objective unchanged.
- The November 18 appointment at 10:00 in the same office was confirmed. Morgan will review meal attempts, fatigue, mood and barriers then. No referral was requested or made during this visit.
Completed DAP note
Encounter: DP-01; individual psychotherapy, office; November 11, 2026, 10:00–10:45, 45 minutes. Client Casey; clinician Morgan, LCSW. Entered and signed November 11 at 11:05. Related records: October 28 intake and current treatment plan.
D — Data: Casey reported preparing an evening meal on 2 of the past 7 days, consistent with the November 4–10 activity record. Casey described ongoing fatigue and difficulty deciding what to cook: “I can start if I decide what to make before I get home.” Reviewed the record and barriers, then used activity scheduling to divide meal preparation into smaller steps. Casey chose two meals from three clinician-provided options and independently wrote the shopping list. Participated throughout; speech was quiet with conversational rate. In direct inquiry, Casey reported no suicidal thoughts or self-harm since the previous session. No standardized symptom measure administered today.
A — Assessment: The reported frequency of meal preparation has increased from 0 to 2 days per week. The objective of at least 3 days for 2 consecutive weeks remains unmet. Casey still needed help choosing meals; fatigue and indecision continue to limit routine activity. Continue planning support and review completion of the two meal attempts at the next appointment. Casey prefers a paper activity record. The documented safety response is a client report, not a comprehensive risk formulation.
P — Plan: Casey agreed to try the two selected meals before November 18 and record attempts and barriers on paper. The longer-term objective remains unchanged. Continue the agreed weekly therapy schedule; next office appointment confirmed for November 18 at 10:00. Morgan will review the activity record, fatigue, mood and barriers at that visit and reconsider the task size with Casey. No referral made today.
What makes the note traceable
Casey’s activity record and verbal report both give 2 meals in 7 days, compared with the intake baseline of 0. Morgan helped Casey choose meals; Casey then wrote the shopping list independently. The two meal attempts are this week’s task. The longer-term objective remains at least 3 days per week for 2 consecutive weeks.
The safety entry identifies Casey as the source and covers the period since the previous session. Record broader risk-assessment findings and resulting actions when that assessment is completed.
DP-02: unchanged progress and a revised plan
In this fictional encounter, Taylor and Morgan revise a walking task after a week with no measurable improvement.
Source facts: On November 11, Taylor attended an office session from 14:00 to 14:30 with Morgan, LCSW. Taylor reported completing none of three planned morning walks in the previous week, unchanged from the preceding week. Taylor had started overnight shifts and said, “The morning plan doesn’t fit when I’m sleeping.” Morgan reviewed the schedule with Taylor, offered a written activity worksheet and accepted Taylor’s preference to plan verbally. Taylor selected a 5-minute walk after waking on two days. The November 18, 14:00 follow-up was confirmed. Morgan entered and signed the note at 14:50. Safety and mental status findings and referral status are not documented in this case.
D — Data: Taylor reported 0 of 3 planned morning walks, unchanged from the prior week, and described a new overnight work schedule. Reviewed the conflict between sleep time and the planned activity. Taylor declined a written worksheet and participated in verbal planning, selecting a 5-minute walk after waking on two days.
A — Assessment: The morning-walk objective remains unmet. Taylor’s overnight shifts conflict with the planned timing. Taylor participated in choosing an after-waking walk; completion will be reviewed on November 18.
P — Plan: Taylor agreed to attempt the revised walks and report completion and barriers at the confirmed November 18, 14:00 office visit. Morgan will review whether the revised timing is workable before agreeing on further changes. The prior morning-walk task is replaced for this week.
Practice: correct an unsupported DAP draft
Use only the DP-02 source facts above. Identify the unsupported statements before opening the correction.
D: Taylor refused treatment and did not exercise. A: Poor motivation; no safety concerns. P: Continue the same homework. Referral completed.
Reveal the DP-02 correction
“Refused treatment” overstates a declined worksheet: Taylor participated in verbal planning. “Did not exercise” broadens a report about three planned walks into a claim about all activity. Taylor described a scheduling conflict, which the draft labels “poor motivation.” No safety assessment or completed referral is documented.
Corrected D: Taylor reported completing none of three planned morning walks and described a new overnight shift schedule. Declined the written worksheet and participated in verbal planning with Morgan, selecting a 5-minute walk after waking on two days.
Corrected A: Completion of the three planned morning walks remains 0/3, unchanged from the previous week. The morning timing conflicts with Taylor’s reported sleep schedule. Taylor helped revise the plan; effectiveness of the change remains to be reviewed.
Corrected P: Replace this week’s morning-walk task with the agreed after-waking attempts. Morgan will review completion and barriers at the confirmed November 18, 14:00 appointment.
If the incorrect version has already been signed, follow the record’s correction procedure. Preserve the original entry and identify the correction’s author, entry date, affected encounter and reason. Do not backdate a clarification or turn a later conversation into an event that happened during the original visit.
DAP vs SOAP and BIRP
The formats organize similar encounter material differently. Choose the structure your service uses and confirm that it captures the required information.
| Format | Where the evidence goes | Writing consideration |
|---|---|---|
| DAP | Client report, observations, intervention and response share Data; interpretation goes in Assessment. | Use clear attribution so the combined section remains easy to follow. |
| SOAP | Subjective and Objective separate reported information from observable findings. | Keep the clinician’s synthesis in Assessment and future actions in Plan. |
| BIRP | Behavior, Intervention and Response have their own sections before Plan. | Make the response specific to the intervention documented. |
The SOAP note guide and BIRP examples show those layouts. Converting a note between formats should preserve its attribution, timing and uncertainty. Moving a client’s claim into an Objective box does not make it independently verified.
Check payer documentation requirements
Payer requirements depend on the program, jurisdiction, service and date of service. The following US policy examples were checked November 11, 2026.
Medicare: a specific contractor’s instructions
Wellpoint Federal’s Medicare article A56937, revised effective April 1, 2026, covers jurisdictions J6 and JK. It calls for encounter documentation, service and time information where relevant, provider identity and credentials, and a record supporting medical necessity. The record must address target symptoms, goals and how outcomes will be monitored. Some continuing information, including the treatment plan and prognosis, must be updated and available without being restated in every encounter note. Check the article and associated LCD for the service being billed. CMS-hosted A56937
For DP-01, check that the encounter, service time, symptoms, functional difficulty, treatment objective, delivered intervention and response agree with the rest of the record. Verify the service code and required authentication alongside the narrative.
California Medi-Cal: behavioral health progress notes
DHCS BHIN 23-068 addresses Specialty Mental Health, Drug Medi-Cal and Drug Medi-Cal Organized Delivery System services. For non-group notes it specifies service type, service date, direct-care duration, location, provider name and signature, signature date, how the service addressed behavioral health needs, and next steps. It generally requires completion within 3 business days, or 1 calendar day for crisis services, with the service date counted as day zero. These are program-specific deadlines. DHCS notice, pages 9–10
The notice allows relevant information elsewhere in the clinical record to remain there instead of being duplicated in the note. Its care-planning provisions also differ by service and setting. Use the current DHCS CalAIM guidance to check subsequent instructions and the applicable program.
Before signing, compare your note fields with the current policy: actual service time, diagnosis or problem linkage, required participants, telehealth details when applicable, authentication and completion deadline. Keep the policy name and effective date in your organization’s documentation procedure so staff can locate the rule behind a requirement.
Privacy and psychotherapy notes
In US HIPAA terminology, a routine DAP progress note in the medical record is different from separately maintained psychotherapy notes. HHS’s definition of psychotherapy notes excludes items such as service times and summaries of diagnosis, functioning, treatment plans and progress. The heading “DAP” does not determine the record’s privacy category. HHS explanation
Record the detail needed to understand the service and care decision. Avoid unnecessary identifying information about relatives, employers or other group members. NASW’s record-keeping standard calls for accurate, timely documentation that supports continuity and includes information directly relevant to service delivery. NASW Code of Ethics, section 3.04
Complete the template in your organization’s approved clinical record. When using a note-drafting tool, confirm permitted data use and verify each attribution, clinical conclusion and planned action before authentication.
Copyable DAP note template
Copy the prompts or download the matching editable text file. The encounter fields sit above DAP so the narrative does not have to carry every administrative detail. Keep a visible distinction between information that was assessed, unknown and not assessed.
For a broader encounter layout, see the therapy progress note template. Its fields can also help when a service requires information beyond this worksheet.
DAP documentation checklist
Review the draft against the encounter facts before signing:
- Confirm the correct person, date, service, setting and actual service time. Separate encounter time from entry and signature time.
- Attribute reports to the client, another person or an identified record. State the period covered by counts or measures.
- Name the intervention delivered and the client’s response, including declined activities or help provided.
- Tie Assessment to those facts and the relevant objective. Check that “met,” “partly met” or “unchanged” matches the measure.
- Keep unassessed findings visible. Replace default “normal” or “no safety concerns” statements with the actual assessment and actions.
- Record the agreed next action, its owner and review point. Check that appointment and referral status are accurate.
- Compare the narrative with structured fields, current care planning and applicable payer requirements.
- Authenticate under the correct author’s credentials. Correct errors through the system’s dated amendment process.
Frequently asked questions
What does DAP stand for in mental health notes?
Data, Assessment and Plan. It is a way to organize a progress note around encounter information, clinical interpretation and the next steps.
What belongs in the Data section of a DAP note?
Relevant client reports, observations, interventions delivered and client responses. Identify who supplied the information and when it applies. Clinical interpretation belongs in Assessment.
Is Data the same as Objective in a SOAP note?
No. DAP Data can include subjective reports as well as observable findings. Use phrases such as “client reported” to preserve the source within the combined section.
What should the Assessment section say?
Explain what today’s findings mean for the current problem and treatment objective. Include the basis for the judgment and any uncertainty that affects the next decision.
Where do the intervention and response go?
Usually in Data, with their significance discussed in Assessment. Name what the clinician did and how the client responded, rather than listing an approach without describing the session.
How long should a DAP note be?
Long enough to explain the service, relevant findings, reasoning and next steps. The payer sources discussed here specify content requirements, not a universal word count.
Can I use bullet points?
Yes, if the approved record supports them and their meaning is clear. Preserve the relationship between an intervention and its response; disconnected labels can leave that relationship ambiguous.
How do I document no improvement?
State the unchanged finding, its source and the comparison period. Explain the next clinical decision. DP-02 shows a revised task after the original timing conflicted with the client’s work schedule.
How do I record a declined activity?
Name the activity, the client’s stated reason if offered, and any alternative accepted. Declining one worksheet does not establish refusal of all treatment.
Does every DAP note need a new diagnosis?
No. Refer to the applicable current assessment and record clinically supported changes when they occur. Check where the payer and record system require diagnostic or problem information.
Are DAP notes accepted by Medicare or Medicaid?
The headings alone do not establish acceptance. Check the program’s requirements for the service and date, including the supporting record, code, time and author. Two specific policy examples appear above.
Are DAP notes protected psychotherapy notes under HIPAA?
A DAP progress note in the medical record does not become a separately protected psychotherapy note because of its title. HHS defines that category by its content and separation from the record.
Can I copy the previous note?
Recheck every carried-forward field. Prior observations, safety findings, service time and completed tasks should not appear as new findings unless they were established during the current encounter.
How do I correct a signed DAP note?
Use the system’s amendment process to identify the error and correction with the actual author and date. Preserve the original history and distinguish a correction from information obtained later.
Can I download the DAP template?
Yes. The text download above matches the on-page prompts and includes the documentation checklist. Save and complete it within your organization’s approved workflow for patient information.